Ideological extremists and their followers ignore this
quote: “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one
begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.”
- Sherlock Holmes in A Scandal in Bohemia
Ideology, when seen through
unbiased lenses, is truth. Ideology, when looked upon with the idea
that religions (any religion, or all religions) in whole and/or in part, are
good, or bad, and/or states of rule – in whole and/or in part, are seen as good
or bad (black and white) taint the truth. There are good, bad and neutral in
both religious and political ideologies alike. (Yes, religion IS an ideology, where
spirituality is not. Most religions force the practitioner into believing there
is no distinction betwixt religion and spirituality, when there is a huge
distinction). Ideology is about control, fear and/or segregation (us, vs.
them), whereas spirituality is about freedom, inclusion and peace.
I include Atheistic beliefs in the religious
ideologies category as well. For extreme Atheistic thoughts and their
counterparts (for the most part), twist facts to suit their respective
thoughts, theories, and/or beliefs. Extremist thinking tends to ignore, pass
over or twist evidence to suit their own needs, ignoring vital information,
counter to their desires. Pacifist followers of extremist minded people do the
same, but at least they do not force others into believing or thinking as they.
That is why extremist thinking is so dangerous.
Furthermore and lastly,
every single person deserves the same level of approval for being human alone.
A person shan't be completely disapproved of, where various individual (traits
if you will), thoughts, beliefs and/or actions, may be deserving of disrespect.
A belief is in no way the whole person, merely a tiny aspect of that person. To
wrap an entire person as being a specific thing, and disregarding the rest, is
a part of ideological thinking. An individual is more – far more than any one
person can pinpoint! Every single person has aspects to admire, as well as
aspects to loath, and yet other aspects to be indifferent of.
Marty R. Woodcock
I welcome your thoughts on this - if you have any.
No comments:
Post a Comment